Breaking: Legal representative takes legal action against AGF, NASS, IGP, Army, Navy, Airforce over statement of Amotekun as prohibited

0
140

Lagos socio critic and human rights activist, Chief Malcolm Emokinovo Omirhobo on Friday submitted a fit prior to a Federal High Court in Lagos, challenging the statement as prohibited, of operation Amotekun in the western states of Nigeria.
In his fit, the complainant signed up with the following offenders; the President of Nigeria, Chief Law Officer of the Federation, National Assembly, Inspector General of Cops, The Army, Navy and Airforce.

READ ALSO: Amotekun: Guvs require not look for consent to trigger action– Shonibare.
He likewise signed up with the Chief law officer of Lagos State, Ogun State, Oyo State, Ondo State, Osun Sttate, and Ekiti States.
Likewise signed up with are Lawyer Generals of Zamfara, Gombe, Kano, Katsina, Kaduna, Niger, Borno, Bauchi, Jigawa, Kebbi, Sokoto, and Yobe States.
His Originating summons is brought pursuant to Order 3 GUIDELINES 6, 7 AND 9 OF THE FEDERAL HIGH COURT (CIVIL TREATMENT) GUIDELINES 2019 and under the Fundamental Jurisdiction of the court.
Omirhobo desires the court to choose whether it is prejudiced, incorrect, prohibited, illegal unconstitutional and undemocratic for the Nigerian federal government to support the improvement, institutionalization and application of Sharia and using Sharia Cops (HISBAH) running parallel with the Nigerian Police in the offender northern States with Public funds while declining to support the facility of Operation Amotekun, a vigilante nonreligious security attire, established within the context of a Federal system of Federal government to enhance and match the Nigerian Cops.
He desires the court to choose whether by the clear analysis of the arrangements of areas 1( 1) and 10 of the 1999 Constitution, it appertains, legal, legal, constitutional and democratic for the offenders to change, institutionalise and carry out Sharia in their States with Public funds taking into cognizance the reality that Nigeria is a nonreligious State.
Omirhobo likewise desires the court to choose whether the arrangements of the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, is the supreme law of Nigeria and its arrangements have binding force on all the Accuseds and all individuals and authorities in Nigeria.
The attorney for that reason, desires the court to state THAT:.
” It is prejudiced, incorrect, prohibited, illegal, unconstitutional and undemocratic for the Nigerian Federal government to support the improvement, institutionalization and application of Sharia and using Sharia Cops (HISBAH) in northern States, while stating prohibited, the facility of Operation Amotekun, a nonreligious, vigilante security attire, established within the context of a Federal system of Federal government to enhance and match the Nigerian Cops.
” That it is incorrect, prohibited, illegal, unconstitutional and undemocratic for the offenders to change, institutionalise and carry out Sharia in their States with Public funds taking into cognizance the reality that Nigeria is a nonreligious State.
” That the arrangements of the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (As Changed), is the supreme law of Nigeria and its arrangements have binding force on all.
The attorney as a result, desire the court to make an ORDER: “Limiting the federal government, their servant representatives and/or privies from victimizing the Nigerian Public in the South West Zone that is Lagos, Ogun, Ondo, Osun, Oyo and Ekiti States by denying them of those rights, benefits, chances or benefits to secure their lives and homes which the Nigerian Public in Zamfara, Kano, Sokoto, Kastina, Bauchi, Borno, Jigawa, Kebbi, Yobe, Kaduna, Niger and Gombe States are accorded and permitted to delight in.
” An Order, limiting the offenders from institutionalising and carrying out Sharia and appropriating public funds for the nourishment of Sharia Cops (HISBAH) in their numerous States.
” An Order dissolving Sharia Cops (HISBAH) in Zamfara, Kano, Sokoto, Kastina, Bauchi, Borno, Jigawa, Kebbi, Yobe, Kaduna, Niger and Gombe States as part of State security facilities.
” An Order, engaging the offenders their servants, representatives and privies to secure and appreciate the basic rights to liberty from discrimination, right to life, right to obtain and own stationary home and the right to liberty of motion of the Complainant and those of the Nigerian Public in the South West Zone of Nigeria.
READ ALSO: Lagos attorney looks for Court’s analysis on Operation Atilogwu Udo, Crocodile Smile 4, Ayem Akpatuma.
” An order, limiting the offenders, their servants, representatives and privies from bugging, frightening, molesting, dehumanizing, pushing, cowing or bullying the Nigerian Public of the South West Zone who naturally are looking for methods to secure their inalienable right to life and likewise secure their homes and other rights ensured to them by law.
He desires the court to make such additional order or orders, that it considers fit to make in the scenarios of the case.
No date has actually been repaired for hearing of the brand-new fit.
Lead.

Related.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here