It might well end up that in the previous Cambridge University benefited from colonial slavery (Cambridge University investigates its historical links with slave trade, 30 April), however it can likewise be argued that the university remained in truth crucial in ending the servant trade.
Thomas Clarkson, a trainee at St John’s College in the late 18 th century, devoted his entire adult life to ending the servant trade and slavery itself. He was relocated that instructions when, in 1784, the university provided him with a subject for a Latin essay competitors: “Is it legal to make servants of others versus their will?” Clarkson was so horrified by what he found when investigating this essay that he then invested the majority of his life relentlessly working to end slavery.
William Wilberforce guided the project to eliminate the servant trade through parliament, however it was Clarkson who produced important proof, and the British servant trade was lastly ended in 1807 (with British colonial servants being ultimately emancipated in 1833).
As it takes place, Wilberforce was likewise informed at St John’s College. So whatever the result of the proposed questions into its historical participation in the servant trade, the university has a lot to be pleased with in assisting to end that trade.
Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk
• It is undoubtedly ideal that an organization that feels it might have gained from the servant trade must examine if, how and to what degree that advantage was acquired. It is intriguing that the remit of the research study is restricted to the servant trade and “other kinds of pushed labour throughout the colonial duration”. I am thinking that this consists of the fruits of the labour of the regular working class in Britain, and somewhere else, who– if they were not to starve– needed to operate in hellish conditions under which they were hardly able to survive. Naturally, from the mid-19 th century, if their conditions weakened they had the ability to delight in the conveniences of the workhouses.
This state of affairs lasted till the early 20 th century. This is not to recommend that these individuals were, in any method, in a similar position to the servants; however the regular individuals of this nation were oppressed and pushed through situations into dreadful conditions of work that continued for over 100 years after slavery was made prohibited in 1807.
A number of the organisations and people who benefited from slavery continued to benefit from the conditions of the working classes. Efforts by progressives to attempt to alter the condition of the bad were fulfilled by predictions of financial collapse and other scaries (does that have a modern ring to it?). It would be intriguing to carry out a larger research study that was inclusive of the contribution of the working classes, and which might perhaps recognize the advantages to a few of our contemporary upstanding and worthy corporations and organizations.
• As Cambridge University looks for to comprehend how it may have benefited straight from the revenues of slavery, possibly it must make the dedication now to invest any such revenues recognized in the financing of scholarships for gifted, disadvantaged trainees.
• Gaby Hinsliff is ideal (If Cambridge can’t probe its past, who can?, Journal, 1 May). The magnificence of the British empire need to be stabilized versus the pity of slavery, upon which our country’s success was developed. A failure to acknowledge this leads to the sanitisation of history.
The Mayflower 400th anniversary ceremonies, for which Plymouth is the lead city, will start this November, and it appears the very same mythologising of the “pilgrim dads” will be perpetuated. In none of the products produced up until now has the reality of that colonial endeavor been gone over– the theft of land, the massacre of the native individuals, and the success of the New England economy that was developed on the servant trade.
Rather, we will be provided the tale of a group of worthy spiritual refugees (they weren’t), who initially set foot on Plymouth Rock (they didn’t), created Thanksgiving (they didn’t) and ended up being the production story of the United States. Certainly, after 400 years, we can bear to consider the reality of our history.
• Sign up with the dispute– e-mail email@example.com
• Learn more Guardian letters– click on this link to go to gu.com/letters
• Do you have an image you wish to show Guardian readers? Click here to publish it and we’ll release the very best submissions in the letters spread of our print edition