It’s incorrect to state election was militarised, states Gen Buratai, Chief of Army Personnel


The Nigerian Army has actually remained in the eye of the storm over the conduct of soldiers released to offer security throughout the 2019 elections. The soldiers have actually been roundly implicated in numerous quarters of devoting offenses, consisting of partisan disturbance in the electoral procedure, that seriously weakened the trustworthiness and sanctity of the elections. In truth, in the estimate of numerous observers, both Federal Federal Government and the Army stand condemned over the unnecessary militarisation of the electoral procedure.

Chief of Army Personnel Lieutenant General Tukur Buratai/ AFP.

However it is an allegation that the Chief of Army Personnel, Lt. Gen. Tukur Buratai, in this interview with Lead, dismisses in its totality.

By Ebele Orakpo.

THE armed force was implicated of assisting in election malpractices like nabbing of tally boxes. Your response?

Militarisation needs to be specified. What do you suggest by militarisation? How precisely did the military participate in the elections? Generalisation is not the very best. Individuals simply utilize the word militarisation without specifying it. Was the so-called militarisation all over throughout the nation? Why are individuals making a lot sound about it? They are offering the impression that the armed force was associated with the whole procedure in the entire nation. It is simply most likely a meaning they just limited to Lagos or where?

. Niger-Delta mainly.

Individuals can not simply utilize the word militarisation in basic terms to state the security firms were included. Who are individuals included? What does the Constitution state about the function of the armed force? We have the constitutional arrangement. We have actually made it really clear; we are not part of these elections, we are just supporting the cops.

Anything we do there is assisting the cops who are representing the civil authority in police and it is really clear that we have actually been called out to support the civil authority. That does not suggest militarisation. And when we head out there, we are carrying out cops function, it is not a military function, we are supporting the cops basically; that is really clear. The armed force was called out to come and support the cops. So, they are simply utilizing the military in order to validate their failures, to validate their insufficiencies, to validate their failure to rig due to the fact that the security requires offered the required security to avoid huge rigging, tally box-snatching and so on. However strictly, making use of the word, militarisation is lost, it is incorrect. We existed to perform our duties based upon the invite to support the cops which is genuine.

There is no other way you will state that the election was militarised; it is abuse of the term. If truly the election was militarised, I inform you, no one would take the law into his hands the method they did brazenly and intentionally did, even assaulting our guys, eliminating our workers. An officer was eliminated, police officers were eliminated so if we were to take extreme actions to truly reveal we were included, it would have been even worse than this.

We had the ability to keep order; we had the ability to perform ourselves within the guidelines of engagement which is genuine. So there is an intentional misunderstanding or misconception of the function of the military in order to revile the military and challenge it regardless of the stupendous efforts we have actually made to make sure security in assistance of the civil authority.

And you understand extremely well if the security firms, consisting of the military, had not come out to support the elections in offering security, the level of insecurity, the level of killings, arson, tally box-snatching and so on, would have been even worse than what was experienced.

Many of the stakeholders, both in the house and abroad, have actually applauded the military for staying neutral, objective and performing themselves expertly; however a couple of components who felt they were not provided the opportunity to rig and to disrupt on a huge scale the election procedure, are the ones screaming that the entire procedure was militarised.

The armed force was not there to support any political celebration; we existed to offer sufficient security as asked for, in assistance of the electoral procedure. That was basically what we did. So to state that the procedure was militarised is a lost usage of word; it is regrettable.

For many years, from our historic experiences, the results or outcomes of elections have actually been the significant reason for instability in our polity. They have actually caused a great deal of killings, arson, you call it: in Kaduna, Zangon-Kataf, Modakeke therefore numerous other locations. So traditionally, if you take a look at it, we had those regrettable events due to the fact that they were enabled to go out of control.

We had numerous hidden aspects; even in the First Republic, we saw the hidden aspects that caused the civil war; it is the very same result of elections that caused that, characterised by numerous malpractices. So federal government does not desire the very same thing to occur which was why the armed force was contacted to support the cops.

There is no other way we would be partisan; the nation’s stability, the nation’s peace is our watchword, it is really, really basic. Some individuals simply picked to blame various entities and bodies for their failures.

Ladies storm INEC head office, fault military participation in elections


On the accusation that the soldiers captured nabbing tally boxes are phony.

” Yes, that is another measurement due to the fact that as I stated, those individuals that did not desire the election to go efficiently, produced their own regional militia, provided military and cops uniforms to be leaving occasionally to misbehave, take tally boxes, to interfere with the electoral procedure and so on. So anybody that sees them will immediately state it is the military which is entirely at variation with our standard procedure, with our principles and the method we train our officers and guys to guarantee they act expertly; that is really clear. We detained numerous of them and you should have seen our press launches with photos of the phony soldiers, phony police officers, phony security operatives and so on. So when you see this, it is not the Army that produced those ones and provided uniforms; so rather of them to confess their drawbacks and misbehavior, they are covering their abhorrent activities/crimes under the guise of militarisation.

It is so agonizing, so dreadful that they do not have conscience and continue to blame the military for their own naughty actions. This is where journalism requires to be unbiased, take a look at it seriously. The Army can not go and dress phony individuals or bad guys to go and act upon their behalf. We have seen the goons, the militias; so where does the military can be found in?

2019 Election: Egbeme-Ijaw youths to Buratai, call your Army to purchase


These are really clear. So we need to be sensible and unbiased; we are paid by the state to make sure that we protect our nation and avoid breakdown of order for us to advance; there is no other method. It is really crucial.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here