In looking for to describe the phenomenon of grade inflation in a few of our college organizations (Universities watchdog threatens fines over grade inflation, 19 December), the Workplace for Trainees may review simply how the “worth” and suggesting connecting to a top-notch degree has actually been affected by the incremental shift of focus enforced upon the HE sector by policymakers. There is a basic stress within the sector in between market concepts and academic worths: a stress which will undoubtedly be managed in a different way by various organizations.
In an environment where trainees and instructors alike are ever more instrumentally driven by the characteristics of competitors, judgments about how to separate in between the outcomes of effort and intellectual proficiency (calling for a 2:1) and creativity and intellectual dexterity (calling for a very first) are ever harder to make. There is no simple balance to be struck in between, on the one hand, the need that we optimise the work potential customers of undergrads and the “competitiveness” of our organizations, and, on the other, sustaining the suitable that HE has to do with promoting the intrinsic worth of human understanding.
Teacher of social policy, London School of Economics
• University grade inflation is not brand-new. I was teaching in a Russell Group university in the 1990 s. For several years about 10% of finalists in the department had actually been granted superior degrees. At one inspectors’ conference it ended up being clear that this figure was going to increase substantially. On challenging this, I was informed that a particular post-1992 university was granting substantially more firsts, which we needed to transfer to stay competitive in hiring trainees.
Call and resolve provided
• The OfS can puff all it likes to resolve what its president calls “this spiralling grade inflation” in our universities. However this will have no result unless the nub of the concern is dealt with: the incompatibility in between the evaluation of private course modules and the honours degree category system.
Considering that universities modularised their courses, academics accountable for evaluating private modules have, rather appropriately, been motivated to do justice to impressive accomplishment by utilizing the complete variety of marks and not to be prevented by the honours category requirements, which state that the limit for a top-notch degree is 70%. Not remarkably, an increasing variety of the very best trainees have actually been offered module marks above 70%, consequently pressing their general grade to above 70%. To put it simply, the rather dotty honours category system, which ridiculously includes a “very first” inhabiting the top 30% of the evaluation scale, is mostly to blame for grade inflation. It must have been reformed when modularisation was presented or changed by a records providing finishing trainees a mathematical record of their evaluation to opt for their degree certificate.
If the OfS is major about taking on grade inflation, it must take an excellent take a look at the honours degree system.
• So the OfS wishes to stop universities from granting the class of degree to which they believe their trainees are entitled? What will those trainees denied of their just benefits make from that? The aggregate-level information pointed out by the OfS is of little usage. What would be intriguing to understand is the number of real trainees stopped working to satisfy the requirements for the award of firsts and upper seconds. To that end, it would assist if the OfS would release its requirements for the award of these grades. Simply what does a “very first” include? What are the anticipated requirements? Some clearness from the OfS would assist prior to we go back to the bad old days of standard referencing. The method embraced so far by OfS is intellectually careless, definitely not worthwhile of a very first.
Previously senior consultant for additional education, Dudley LEA, Sutton Coldfield, West Midlands
• You report that the Office for Students has actually discovered grade inflation in university degrees because 2010-11 to have actually been “considerable and inexplicable”. Could the description have something to do with the reality that the issue appears to have started around the time when ₤ 9,000 tuition charges were presented and trainees began to be mentioned as “customers”?
• Sign up with the argument– e-mail email@example.com
• Learn more Guardian letters– click on this link to go to gu.com/letters
• Do you have an image you wish to show Guardian readers? Click here to upload it and we’ll release the very best submissions in the letters spread of our print edition